Girl Genius
Girl Genius
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
 
:::: I think that was just an oversight. Le ooops. -- [[User:Corgi|Corgi]] 23:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:::: I think that was just an oversight. Le ooops. -- [[User:Corgi|Corgi]] 23:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
   
::: ...! Dammit. Yes, that was an oversight. Don't mind me, carry on. '''''— [[User:Mnenyver|m]]''''' <sup>[[User_talk:Mnenyver|(talk)]]</sup> 19:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
+
:::: ...! Dammit. Yes, that was an oversight. Don't mind me, carry on. '''''— [[User:Mnenyver|m]]''''' <sup>[[User_talk:Mnenyver|(talk)]]</sup> 19:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:07, 23 August 2009

Forums: Index > Watercooler > Wild Jägers


I happened to notice we have neither article nor redirect(s) for Wild Jägers/monsters. We do have a category, though. It seems a curious omission. Any opinion on whether an actual article needs to be written? I think it isn't well-addressed in the regular Jäger article, either. -- Corgi 19:16, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

I think they deserve an article separate from the main article (since they are against the general "norm") or at least a flushed out category definition that describes their mission, ect.-- Axi 20:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Edit: So.... There's a section under Da Boyz that does address this... but it seems silly to have an article on Da Boyz, each boy, Jenka and Füst... and then a category to cover them all in that doesn't have an explaination. If the category of wild Jagers exists... why isn't Da Boyz a category too? -- Axi 20:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
I can see how this confusing situation came about, but that doesn't help clean it up. I think a "Boyz" category is redundant with Wild Jagers, since they're the only three we know by name and so the only three who would have articles. My opinion is that, for the sake of simplicity, an article named Wild Jagers should be a redirect for now. But I hold no strong opinions on this. m (talk) 17:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
So Jenka doesn't count as a Wild Jager? -- Axi 19:15, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
I think that was just an oversight. Le ooops. -- Corgi 23:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
...! Dammit. Yes, that was an oversight. Don't mind me, carry on. m (talk) 19:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)