Girl Genius
Advertisement
Girl Genius

Wilhelm's obsession with Lucrezia was most likely of a sexual nature - and the Lady Mongfish seems to love leading guys around by the dangly bits. Putting aside for the moment the already disturbing action of performing deadly experiments on one's progeny; what the hell was His Deranged Highness Prince Aaronev VI thinking when tried to resurrect that sex-crazed genocidal nutcase in his DAUGHTER'S BODY?!?!

I'm suddenly in need of brain bleach - anybody remember how Egyptian royalty was about preserving the "power" of their bloodlines? The Spark is hereditary... -spew-

Okay, show of hands. Who thinks it needs to be stated that the entire Sturmvoraus clan is quite possibly severely messed up? Kalaong 08:11, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, serious squick factor. Honestly, though, I'm not sold on the idea that this set of facts is a given. There's always room for doubt. By the way, talk pages are used for sorting out what goes in an article and any other "meta" problems folks may be having. If you're asking if this issue should go back in the main article, I would say it doesn't. Discussion should be carried on in forums. Just trying to stay organized. :) --mnenyver 19:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I would support putting the above observation, with suitable voice, in /Mad, though.

Additionally, it should be noted that much of the current article is derived from statements made by Tarvek, taken at face value. We all know how that is: Tarvek is like the Press, inasmuch as everything it says is absolutely true, except for statements that one has the ability to verify first hand.

Zarchne 01:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Ha. Excellent point. I have to admit, though, I actually don't dispute Tarvek's version of events. It seems likely to me that Aaronev was, in fact, trying to resurrect Lucrezia in Anevka's body. It's just that the allegations being made here where Aaronev's intentions are concerned rely on knowing things about his character that we will most likely never know. Given the age rating of this comic and that this character was modeled on a very good friend of the Professors', it's entirely possible Aaronev was not entirely guilty on that one matter. The character's still an evil little rat, though. :D --mnenyver 16:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Gonna put a Mad in here, I think[]

I was just re-reading the "Goodbye, Anevka " page and I noticed that Tarvek refers to her as a "...very good first try" which made me think that she was a Clank on the order of the Muses, meaning self-aware (after all, he's the leading Clank-ologist of his time). So I'm putting this note in the Discussion so I remember to add a /Mad page to Anevka. I assume that would be the wiki-proper place to put that sort of theory, right? CaptMorgan 21:31, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

Here try this. --Rej¿¤¤? 23:06, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

Edit Anevka_Sturmvoraus (Forum) (Mad)

I OBJECT![]

Anveka, herself never appeared in the Comic ! Only her clank shell did. Anvek was long dead. Bosda Di'Chi (talk) 19:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Valid. Feel free to fix it, including only the history of Anevka herself in this article. However, you also need to create a page for the Anevka clank, in particular when it still actually thinks it's Anevka. And note that, as far as I know, the closest thing we have to a canonical name for the Anevka clank is "Anevka" shown by the semi-canonical name for the Anevka clank carrying a calling (or Dybbuk, eh?) of Lucrezia (which we currently call '"Lunevka"' but potentially 'Dybbuk: Lucrezia-in-the-Anevka-clank'), which semi-canonical name is Lucrezia/Anevka shown in the other art 2018-04-23 (Monday) . Since that name is problematic for the technical reason, I recorded it as "Lucrezia-Anevka" but didn't create a redirect yet as a reminder that maybe the redirect should go the other way. And furthermore, if this ('Lucrezia-Anevka') is accepted as the canonical name for 'Dybbuk: Lucrezia-in-the-Anevka-clank', then the other Dybbuk pages could be renamed to reflect that styling. But again, this goes against your objection, since it uses 'Anevka' to refer to the Anevka clank. ⚙Zarchne (talk) 21:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Advertisement